Contact

Indian Philosophy »  Saṃsāra & Nirvāṇa »  Nirvāṇa »  The ontological tetralemma does not apply to nirvāṇa »  Nirvāṇa is neither an entity nor a non-entity »  Reductio ad absurdum: If nirvāṇa was an entity »  It would be conditioned »  Even impermanent (conditioned) things do not really exist, not to mention permanent things, which are only designated to be unconditioned

Even impermanent (conditioned) things do not really exist, not to mention permanent things, which are only designated to be unconditioned

No cross references

Project Authorities

Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikā of Nāgārjuna

Piṅgala's Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā, section T30, no. 1564, 35a18


Madhyamakahṛdayam of Bhavya

Madhyamakahṛdayam of Bhavya, section 3:131


Narrow Down