Contact

Indian Philosophy »  Persons »  Sense spheres (āyatana) »  Argument from the untenability of possession of action »  There is no necessary conglomeration of that which sees and that which is seen, therefore seeing is not guaranteed »  There is no necessary conglomeration of that which sees and that which is seen, as in the case of the eye faculty being not able to see itself

There is no necessary conglomeration of that which sees and that which is seen, as in the case of the eye faculty being not able to see itself

No cross references

Project Authorities

Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikā of Nāgārjuna

Sthiramati's Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā, section T30, no. 1567, 143a3


Narrow Down