Contact

Indian Philosophy »  Persons »  Sense spheres (āyatana) »  Argument from the untenability of possession of action »  Neither (the instrument) the visual faculty, nor (the action) non-visual faculty see, nor does (the agent) the seer »  That which sees in fact cannot see because seeing does not have a nature

That which sees in fact cannot see because seeing does not have a nature

No cross references

Project Authorities

Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikā of Nāgārjuna

Sthiramati's Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā, section T30, no. 1567, 143a9


Narrow Down