Contact

Indian Philosophy »  Persons »  Sense spheres (āyatana) »  Argument from the untenability of possession of action »  Neither (the instrument) the visual faculty, nor (the action) non-visual faculty see, nor does (the agent) the seer »  That which sees in fact cannot see because seeing does not have a nature »  That which sees and that which is seen do not exist apart from each other

That which sees and that which is seen do not exist apart from each other

No cross references

Project Authorities

Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikā of Nāgārjuna

Sthiramati's Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā, section T30, no. 1567, 143a1


Narrow Down