Indian Philosophy »  Persons »  Sense spheres (āyatana) »  Argument from the untenability of possession of action »  Neither (the instrument) the visual faculty, nor (the action) non-visual faculty see, nor does (the agent) the seer »  That which is seen cannot see either because seeing is without a nature

Project Authorities

Narrow Down

• That which is seen does not exist with a nature because there would neither be that which sees nor that which is seen if causes and conditions were absent
• From that which sees there is no that which is seen, because the different natures of things cannot be seen
• There are that which sees, that which is seen and seeing because of the conglomeration of a doer, her deed and action