Contact

Indian Philosophy »  Persons »  Sense spheres (āyatana) »  Argument from the untenability of possession of action »  There is no seer, no visual faculty, nor object of seeing »  As seeing has no nature, there is no seeing when that which sees and that which is seen do not conglomerate

As seeing has no nature, there is no seeing when that which sees and that which is seen do not conglomerate

No cross references

Project Authorities

Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikā of Nāgārjuna

Sthiramati's Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā, section T30, no. 1567, 143a2


Narrow Down